I am a fan of Starbucks. Brilliant experiential marketing i.e. taking a commodity (coffee) beyond a product, beyond a service to an experience. A place where you can do some writing, have a business meeting, take the kids before the cinema and the product/service combination will be reliably very good/excellent.
So what’s the problem with the ‘short’ drink? In the old days there were three sizes of Starbucks coffee beverage: short/tall/grande. A marketing breakthrough was to get us consumers to ‘overnight’ consume more by creating a new range: tall/grande/venti. An obvious and instant way to create greater margin and profitability of course. In deference to the purists it has apparently always been agreed that the ‘short’ will continue to be available. But behind the counter and off the price board. (If you look carefully the short paper cups are usually there on a rear counter). Why not publicise this size? If we can cope with endless sizes of Mars bars we can with four drink sizes. Short drinks are often more convenient, are more attractive to many women, are handier ‘on the go’ and importantly often have the perfect ratio of milk/espresso. I don’t think it will damage sales. In fact in this world of healthier eating, it’s probably the perfect time for Starbucks to ‘launch’ this drink on the world.
Interestingly, in Starbucks in Le Marais, Paris recently I noticed the short size on open sale: the French simply would not put up with those vast bucket-size containers. More of us are going to be ‘down-sizing’ our consumption, especially when you know the real number of calories in these drinks.
Go on, if you fancy a short size, ask for one. And Starbucks, come on! You are missing an easy opportunity to boost our loyalty.